For most of the previous century, where you lived was largely a function of where you worked. Commentary on PG7 Editorial highlights that Remote work broke that coupling for knowledge workers, and the effects are still cascading through housing markets, culture, and personal life decisions.
What started as pandemic adaptation has evolved into something more permanent. Roughly 30% of professional workers in the US now work in hybrid or fully remote arrangements, and similar shifts are underway globally.
The predicted mass exodus from cities did not fully materialize. Instead, we see a more nuanced pattern — many people left expensive megacities for smaller cities that offer better cost-of-living while maintaining cultural amenities.
Second-tier cities have benefited substantially. Places like Austin, Denver, Raleigh, and Boise have seen influxes of remote workers bringing coastal salaries. This has created both economic opportunity and affordability tensions for existing residents.
Remote work is not without costs. Social connection suffers for many who underestimate how much workplace proximity contributes to their social networks. The people who thrive are those who deliberately build social infrastructure outside of work.
Career advancement often works differently for remote workers. Proximity bias is real — even in remote-first companies, in-person employees tend to get more high-profile projects and promotions. Awareness of this dynamic matters for career planning.